Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-143 - Williams v. Fox


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-143 - Williams v. Fox
March 7, 2017
PDF | More
te Complaint in the consolidated case (Dkt. 3 in No. 1:16-cv-00478-EJL), noting the date it was originally submitted to the Court. Plaintiffs Request for Sanctions, Motion to Strike, and Seal Discovery from the Record (Dkt. 46) is MOOT, as the substantive motion to which it pertains (Dkt. 41) has already been denied as moot. Plaintiffs Motion for Additional Interrogatories/Motion to Strike from the Record Discovery Submitted by Defendant (Dkt. 51) is DENIED. Plaintiffs objections to the Order of Reassignment and Consolidation,construed as motions to sever (Dkt. 54 in Case No. 1:16-cv-00143-EJL & Dkt. 8 in Case No. 1:16-cv-00478-EJL) are DENIED for the reasons statedin the Order of Reassignment and Consolidation. (See Dkt. 53.) Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-00143-EJL, 1:16-cv-00478-EJL(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs) Modified on 3/8/2017 (cjs).ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Defendant Foxs Motion to Stay this case pending the outcome of Plaintiffs interlocutory appeal (Dkt. 33) is MOOT, as that appeal has been dismissed. Plaintiffs request for permission to resubmit his First Amended Complaint, construed as a motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 42) is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint is found at Dkt. 43. To maintain clarity in the record, the Clerk of Court shall add to the docket, in the lead case, the separa
January 11, 2018
PDF | More
sclosed Evidence (Dkt. 80) is GRANTED IN PART... Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs) Modified on 1/11/2018 to reflect mailed to updated address at Dkt. 93 (cjs).ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - 1. Defendants Motion to Compel (Dkt. 74) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Dkt. 75) is GRANTED IN PART to the extent set forth above.3. Defendants Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 79) is GRANTED IN PART... 4. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 61) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling after the parties have disclosed the information required by this Order and within 120 days after entry of this Order. 5. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 77) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling after the parties have disclosed the information required by this Order and within 120 days after entry of this Order. 6. Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions and Request to Consider Late Di