Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-227 - Smith v. Idaho State of


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-227 - Smith v. Idaho State of
February 22, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 32 Motion for discovery and additional time; Discovery ddl 6/14/10. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
March 28, 2011
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 61 Motion to File an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; granting 69 Motion to Expand the Record with Additional Attachments; granting 81 Motion for Leave to File Oversize Brief; dismissing without prejudice 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Amended Petition is deemed filed as of 8/6/2010. Respondents shall file an Answer by 5/27/2011. Petitioner shall file a Reply to the Answer by 6/24/2011. Petitioner's counsel shall submit a proposed budget ex parte and under seal by 4/22/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
March 14, 2012
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 92 Motion for Discovery; denying 104 Motion for Discovery; The Court issues a certificate of appealability over its decision to deny relief on Claim C (subpart 4) (ineffective assistance of counsel in investigating and challenging the forensic evidence). The certificate of appealabilty will also encompass the Courts ruling denying Petitioners Motion for Additional Discovery and to Release Evidence (Dkt. 92), as it relates to Claim C (4). No other claims or rulings in this case will be included within the certificate. Upon the filing of a timely notice of appeal in this case, and not until such time, the Clerk of Court shall forward the necessary paperwork to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for the docketing of an appeal in a civil case.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
March 14, 2012
PDF | More
JUDGMENT that this cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice and Petitioner shall take nothing from Respondents. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
December 18, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that, on or before 1/17/2014, Respondent Lawrence Wasden shall provide Petitioner with a copy of Detective Rodriguez's file and shall file a notice of compliance with the Clerk of Court, or show cause in a written response to this Order why he cannot provide the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
March 31, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The Order and Judgment previously entered in this action (Dkts. 112, 113) are VACATED. Petitioner's Motion for Additional Discovery and to Release Evidence (Dkt. 138) is DENIED. 3. Respondent's Motions for Extension of Time to file Answer (Dkts. 140 & 142) are GRANTED. 4. Petitioner's Second Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)