Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-184 - Vasquez v. City of Idaho Falls


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-184 - Vasquez v. City of Idaho Falls
December 20, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Citys Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 20) is GRANTED on the following four claims: (1) racial discrimination in violation of Title VII; (2) racialdiscrimination in violation of the IHRA; (3) retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII; and (4) retaliatory discharge in violation of the IPEPA. 2. Any remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack ofsubject matter jurisdiction. 3. The Citys Motion to Strike (Dkt. 28) is GRANTED IN PART consistent with the above analysis. 4. Vasquezs Motion to Strike (Dkt. 29) is DENIED AS MOOT. 5. The Court will enter judgment separately in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
March 1, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 37) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)