Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-2477 - Riffey et al v. Rauner et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-2477 - Riffey et al v. Rauner et al
November 12, 2010
PDF | More
ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the Courtroom Deputy on 11/12/2010:Mailed notice(keg, )
November 12, 2010
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 11/12/2010:Mailed notice(keg, )
June 7, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/7/2016: Plaintiffs' motion for class certification 80 is denied. The proposed class definition is too broad because it contains a great number of people who could not have been injured by defendants' conduct. But even if injury can be presumed, plaintiffs' pursuit of refunds on behalf of a class requires individualized determinations that predominate over the remaining common questions. This denial is without prejudice to plaintiffs revising their proposed class definition or seeking class certification on non-damages issues. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )
August 23, 2016
PDF | More
MOTION by Plaintiffs Theresa Riffey, Susan Watts, Stephanie Yencer-Price for judgment Joint Motion (Messenger, William)