Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-7632 - Dyson v. Village of Midlothian


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-7632 - Dyson v. Village of Midlothian
October 11, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 10/11/2013: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants the defendants' motion to dismiss 32 and dismisses without prejudice any individual capacity § 1983 claim plaintiff asserts against defendants Burke and Zamiar and the Monell claim he asserts against Burke and Zamiar in their official capacities and the Village of Midlothian in Count III of the amended complaint. Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint that comports with this Order. If he fails to do so in that time, the Court will dismiss these claims with prejudice. Mailed notice (cjg, )
February 14, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 2/14/2014: Plaintiff sues defendants, the Village of Midlothian and three of its police officers, Anthony Valente, David Burke and Steve Zamiar, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 for violating and conspiring to violate his constitutional rights. Defendants have filed a motion pursuant to FederalRule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. Mailed notice (cjg, )
June 13, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 6/13/2014: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendants' motion to dismiss the third amended complaint 80. The motion is granted as to the claims in Counts III and IV, which are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied as to the claims asserted in Counts I and II, which are the only claims that remain in this suit. Status hearing is set for July 2, 2014. Mailed notice (cjg, )
February 18, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER: For the reasons stated below, Defendant's motion for summary judgment 92 is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted as to Plaintiff's claims relating to his arrest, the search of his person, and the seizure of his car. Summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's claims alleging that the initial traffic stop was unconstitutional. Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 2/18/2015 Mailed notice (ks, )
March 16, 2016
PDF | More
mus [Dkt. # 141] is taken under advisement pending a submission as detailed herein. Mailed notice (cjg, ) MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 3/16/2016: For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Anthony Valente's motion in limine 4 to bar allegations of or testimony regarding selective enforcement or racial ani