Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-3526 - Martin et al v. F.E. Moran, Inc., Fire Protection of Northern Illinois


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-3526 - Martin et al v. F.E. Moran, Inc., Fire Protection of Northern Illinois
October 24, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order pursuant to minute entry [#42} dated 7/14/2014 Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/24/2014:Mailed notice(wp, )
March 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/24/2017. The Court denies FPN's motion to strike the report and barthe testimony of Plaintiffs' expert, Destiny Peery, Ph.D. (Dkt. No. 159.) The Court also denies FPN's motion to strike and bar Plaintiffs' expert, William Bridges, Ph.D. (Dkt. No. 226), and denies Plaintiffs' motion to strike and bar FPN's rebuttal expert, Jonathan Guryan, Ph.D. (Dkt. No. 246). Mailed notice(lk, )
April 10, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/10/2017. The Court denies FPN's Motions for Summary Judgment against Martin 193, Truesdell 197, and Tejada 201. Mailed notice(lk, )
March 30, 2018
PDF | More
hat FPN laid off, failed to transfer or failed to rehire them because of their race. Judgment to follow. Mailed notice(lk, )MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/30/2018. The Court held a twelve-day bench trial between April 10, 2017 and May 12, 2017 to resolve remaining claims, which included: unlawful discrimination against Martin under Section 1981 (Count III) based on FPN's failure to transfer him after his 2009 layoff and under Title VII (Count I) and Section 1981 (Count III) based on FPN's failure to transfer or rehire him after his 2010 layoff; unlawful discrimination against Truesdell under Section 1981 (Count III) based on FPN's failure to transfer him after his 2009 layoff and under Title VII (Count I) and Section 1981 (Count III) based on FPN's failure to transfer or rehire him after his 2010 layoff; and unlawful discrimination against Tejada under Section 1981 (Count III) based on his 2010layoff and FPN's subsequent failure to transfer or rehire him. The Court concludes that Plaintiffs Martin, Truesdell and Tejada have not proven t