Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1420 - Straw v. Kloecker et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1420 - Straw v. Kloecker et al
March 5, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/5/2014. (ao,)
March 26, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/26/2014. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (srb,)
September 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff Shaw's motion to strike 28 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/8/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )
August 4, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, plaintiff's verified motion to reconsider order denying motion to strike 30 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/4/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
September 20, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, plaintiff's motion for permission to amend and to request the case be reopened 32 is denied. This action remains dismissed. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/20/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
October 4, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, plaintiff's verified motion to vacate 37 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/4/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
October 5, 2017
PDF | More
/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )Supplement to October 4, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Immediately before the Conclusion section of this Court's October 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order (the "Opinion"), this Court addressed the "Affidavit To Support Recusal Under 28 U.S.C. ยง144" filed on September 28 by pro se plaintiff Andrew Straw ("Straw"). Although for convenience the discussion in the Opinion at its pages 6 and 7 employed a shorthand reference to that filing as the "Recusal Motion," this Court's review of the case docket has revealed that the Clerk's Office did not treat that filing as a pending motion (see Dkt. No. 39). Nonetheless it is exceedingly plain that the assertions made by Straw in that filing are, as the Opinion concluded at page 7, "totally irrational." Accordingly, to complete the record, this supplement to the Opinion confirms that this Court has rejected the proposed recusal. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/5
October 20, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, copies of Dkt. No. 42 and of this memorandum order are transmitted to the Executive Committee so that it may determine what action is appropriate. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/20/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )