Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

15-1405 - Stevens v. Sharif

Download Files


Document in Context
15-1405 - Stevens v. Sharif
August 4, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Stevens' motion to dismiss63, is denied. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/4/2016:Mailed notice(srn, )
February 2, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum opinion and order, Haifa's motion to intervene 88 is granted, but the Estate's claim is dismissed without prejudice. In light of the Court's decision granting the motion to intervene, and Steven's response to that motion, the Court deems Stevens to have been served with process regarding the Estate's claim. If the Estate can make factual allegations demonstrating that it had an attorney-client relationship with Stevens for the appeal proceedings consistent with the requirements of Rule 11, the Estate may file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint by February 13, 2017. Such a motion is limited to five pages and must attach the proposed amended complaint. Stevens should not respond to any such motion unless the Court so orders. If the Estate fails to file such a motion by February 13, its dismissal will be with prejudice. Status hearing held on 2/2/2017. THE ESTATE OF SOAD WATTAR terminated. Bench Trial set for 10/2/2017 at 09:30 AM. Any motions for summary judgment are to be filed by 4/27/2017. Status hearing set for 4/27/2017 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/2/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
April 24, 2018
PDF | More
MOTION by Plaintiff William J Stevens, Counter Defendant William J Stevens for judgment for ruling (Kater, Scott)