Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1609 - Klingler v. City Of Chicago et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1609 - Klingler v. City Of Chicago et al
February 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order.The City of Chicago Defendants' motion to dismiss, R. 90, is granted in part and denied in part; (2) Defendant Griebel's motion to dismiss, R. 98, is denied; and (3) the motion to dismiss filed by Will County and Will County Sheriff Paul Kaupas, R. 100, is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: The claims against Will County in Counts VI, VII, and IX of the First Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. Sheriff Kaupas is substituted in his official capacity in the place of Will County in Counts VI and VII of the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Monell claims against Will County Sheriff Kaupas and the City of Chicago in Counts IX and X of the First Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. In all other respects, Defendants' motions to dismiss are denied.Plaintiff may file a motion to amend her Monell claims if she does so on or before March 15, 2017. The motion should attach a proposed amendment and a brief of no more than five pages explaining how the proposed amendment cures the deficiencies in the current Monell claims. Defendants should not file a brief responding to Plaintiff's motion to amend (should she choose to file one) unless the Court requests a response. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/24/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
August 8, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:For the foregoing reasons, the City's motion to dismiss 141, is granted as to Count III and denied as to its remaining parts. Defendant Griebel's motion to compel 130 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion to quash 154 is denied, see this Court's 7/26/2017 order. Status hearing held on 8/8/2017. Plaintiff's response to defendant Will County's motion for summary judgment166 is due by 9/22/2017. Defendant's reply is due 10/6/2017. A status hearing set for 10/20/2017 at 09:00 AM. The 9/5/2017 status date is vacated. Plaintiff is to respond to outstanding discovery requests by 8/14/2017. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/8/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
October 20, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated, defendant Will County's motion for summary judgment 166 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/20/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )