Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-5525 - Border v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-5525 - Border v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
July 15, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff Border is ordered to supplement his already-received documentation by specifying the "filing" date in "mailbox rule" terms. That should be done promptly in the form of a brief statement headed by the court caption and explaining the basis for the claimed "filing" date. And because that date will mark the end of the six-month period specified in Section 1915(a)(2), which speaks of the "6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint," while the printout previously submitted by Border has naturally provided information ending on May 21, 2015 (one day before the Certificate was signed), Border must also obtain and provide a further printout that lists all transactions in his trust fund account at the County Jail from that date to the "mailbox rule" date. This Court will then be able (1) to make the necessary calculation under Section 1915 and also (2) to act on Border's Motion for Attorney Representation. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/15/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
August 5, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: On July 15 of this year this Court issued its sua sponte memorandum order ("Order") that explained in detail to pro se prisoner plaintiff Jeremy Border ("Border") the additional information that he was required to provide to enable this Court to make the determination prescribed by 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915 ("Section 1915") to qualify Border for the special type of in forma pauperis ("IFP") status applicable to prisoner plaintiffs. More than three weeks have elapsed since the issuance of the Order without any response by Border. Plaintiff Border is ordered to provide the information called for by the Order (a copy of which is attachedhereto as a precautionary measure against the possibility that Border has misplaced the copy earlier transmitted to him) or before August 27, 2015. If Border has not complied by that date, this action will be dismissed for want of prosecution (although Border will still remain liable for the payment of the $350 filing fee through future installment payments). Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/5/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
September 3, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/3/2015. Mailed notice. (sj, )
October 8, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: The current mailing to both Border and his designated counsel will enable them to communicate with each other well in advance of the November 2 status hearing. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/8/2015:Mailed notice(clw, )
November 19, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 11/19/2015. Mailed notice (jc, )
February 9, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: Because defense counsel has noticed up the Superintendent Arce motion to dismiss for presentment on February 22, counsel is expected to review the Answer that has been dealt with in this memorandum order between now and then. It is further expected that counsel will indicate at that time whether an Amended Answer is called for. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 2/9/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )