Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-10110 - Perales v. County Of Lasalle et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-10110 - Perales v. County Of Lasalle et al
May 26, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/26/2016. Defendants' motion to dismiss claims against them for unconstitutional conditions with prejudice and claims for failure to protect, violations of procedural due process, and deliberate indifference without prejudice 16 is granted. Defendant Correct Care Solutions' motion to dismiss claims against it for deliberate indifference 22 is granted without prejudice. Mailed notice(lk, )
August 10, 2017
PDF | More
and Kaszynski in their individual capacities without prejudice (Counts I, II, III). The Court reiterates its earlier dismissal with prejudice against Perales's Count II claim as it relates to his time in the Booking Cell. (See Dkt. 49.) The Court further grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Perales's IIED claim (Count V) with prejudice for LaSalle Defendants as it pertains to injury outside of Perales's patient care and otherwise without prejudice. The Court denies the remaMEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/10/2017. The Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Perales's claims against Defendant Von Ruden with prejudice (Count II) and Defendants Templeton, Edgcomb, inder of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 93, 104.Mailed notice(lk, )