Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-6097 - The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-6097 - The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al
September 15, 2016
PDF | More
REDACTED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 9/15/2016. Mailed notice (aee, ) (Main Document 107 replaced on 9/22/2016) (jms, ).
January 23, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/23/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
March 22, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/22/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
April 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER on claim construction Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/7/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
August 8, 2017
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/8/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
August 14, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/14/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
August 28, 2017
PDF | More
MOTION by Defendants OWT Industries, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. for judgment as a matter of law (White, Jason)
August 29, 2017
PDF | More
MOTION by Counter Defendants The Chamberlain Group, Inc., The Chamberlain Group, Inc., Plaintiff The Chamberlain Group, Inc. for judgment As A Matter of Law (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A)(Vidal, Katherine)
August 29, 2017
PDF | More
MOTION by Defendants OWT Industries, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. for judgment as a matter of law as to invalidity (White, Jason)
August 30, 2017
PDF | More
MOTION by Counter Defendants The Chamberlain Group, Inc., The Chamberlain Group, Inc., Plaintiff The Chamberlain Group, Inc. for judgment As A Matter of Law (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A)(Vidal, Katherine)
September 27, 2017
PDF | More
MOTION by Defendants OWT Industries, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. for judgment as a Matter of Law (White, Jason)
May 23, 2018
PDF | More
motion for an ongoing royalty (ECF No. 727) by 6/7/18. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/23/2018: Mailed notice (maf) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Court's opinion: (1) TTI's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is denied (Dkt. 573); (2) TTI's Motion for a New Trial is denied (Dkt. 619); (3) Chamberlain's Motion for a Permanent Injunction is granted (Dkt. 622); (4) Chamberlain's Motion for Enhanced Damages is granted (Dkt. 624, 625), and the Court accordingly awards Chamberlain $11.4 million in treble damages; (5) Chamberlain's Motion for Prejudgment Interest and Supplemental Damages is granted in part (Dkt. 630), and the Court awards the following: (a) prejudgment interest of $42,347, calculated by using the 52-week treasury bill rate, compounded monthly; (b) for the '275 patent, $900,793 in GDO lost profits; $54,672 in royalties; and $134,496 in accessory lost profits, unless TTI has some repurchased GDO stock still on hand, in which case TTI may move the Court within fourteen (14) days to reduce the accessory lost profits damages accordingly and; (c) for the '966 patent, $18,224 in royalties; (6) Chamberlain's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is granted in part (Dkt. 703, 704), though the Court will not order any fees until the parties submit, within fourteen (14) days, a joint report as described in the opinion; (7) Chamberlains Bill of Costs is granted in part (Dkt. 634), though the Court will not order any costs until Chamberlain submits, within fourteen (14) days, a revised bill of costs in accordance with the opinion. Status hearing set for 6/19/18 at 9:00 a.m., at which time Defendants will explain whether they still require a ruling on their motion to seal (ECF No. 699). Chamberlain shall respond to Defendants'