Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-6812 - Dayton v. Oakton Community College et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-6812 - Dayton v. Oakton Community College et al
December 6, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/6/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies defendant's motion to stay, filed in Case No. 16-cv-2902. The case remains set for a status hearing this morning as previously ordered. (mk)
May 17, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/17/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants Dayton's motion for collective and class certification [dkt no. 35]. The Court certifies a class consisting of "all part-time and adjunct faculty who were denied employment at Oakton Community College as the result of its policy not to employ or re-employ State Universities Retirement System annuitants and who are not 'affected annuitants' pursuant to 40 ILCS 5/15-139.5(b)(2)" and appoints Nathan D. Eisenberg, Sara J. Geenen, and Erin F. Medeiros, and Stephen Yokich to represent the class. Dayton has also moved for approval of his proposed notice to class members. Defendants have not objected to the proposed notice, and the Court approves the notice Dayton has proposed, except that the word "promulgated," where used, should be changed to "established" to make it more readily understandable. Class counsel are directed to immediately communicate the Court's decision to counsel for the plaintiffs in the two consolidated individual suits. The case remains set for a status hearing on Monday, May 22, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. to set a schedule for further proceedings. (mk)
February 27, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/27/2018: The Court grants plaintiffs' motions to file under seal [16 C 2902, dkt. no. 51] and to file excess pages [16 C 2902, dkt. no. 52]. For the reasons stated above, the Court grants the defendants' motion for summary judgment [16 C 2902, dkt. no. 46; 16 C 6812, dkt no. 66] and directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the defendants in Case Nos. 16 C 2902, 16 C 3215, and 16 C 6812. Mailed notice. (pjg, )