Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-7950 - Bhattacharya et al v. Capgemini North America, Inc et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-7950 - Bhattacharya et al v. Capgemini North America, Inc et al
December 4, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/4/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying order, the Court denies defendants' motion to dismiss but rules that plaintiffs are not entitled to statutory penalties on count 1 of their complaint in its current form. The case remains set for a status hearing on December 5, 2016 as previously ordered. (mk)
March 14, 2018
PDF | More
rties, before that date, to discuss and attempt to agree upon a proposed class notice or notices and to work on compiling a list of appropriate notice recipients. (mk)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/14/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies plaintiffs' motion for class certification without prejudice in part (with respect to count 1) and grants it in part (with respect to counts 2 through 4) [dkt. no. 49]. The Court certifies, pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3), the two subclasses described in the Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs Bhattacharya and Koothapillai are appointed as class representatives, and their current counsel are appointed as class counsel. The Court defers ruling on the parties' pending cross-motions for summary judgment to allow time for class members to receive notice of the action and to avoid running afoul of the rule against one-way intervention. See Costello v. BeavEx, Inc., 810 F.3d 1045, 1057-58 (7th Cir. 2016). The case is set for an in-person status hearing on March 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. The Court expects the pa