Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3900 - Diamond v. Nicholls et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3900 - Diamond v. Nicholls et al
August 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Order: On August 21, 2017 Sid Nicholls ("Sid"), one of the two codefendants in this action brought by David Diamond ("Diamond"), moved (in the "Motion," Dkt. No. 9) for his dismissal from the case for an asserted lack of in personam jurisdiction over him. Because of the imminent reassignment of the bulk of this Court's calendar to its colleagues under this District Court's customary computer-driven random assignment system that applies whenever any of its judges leaves the court, and as this Court must do because of its recent surgery and the ongoing rehabilitative process, Diamond's counsel is ordered to file a response to the Motion on or before [21 days]. Resolution of the Motion (which may or may not call for a reply by Sid) will be left to the assignee judge. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/24/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
March 1, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 3/1/2018. Mailed notice. (mgh, )