Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-50037 - Cosgriff v. County Of Winnebago et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-50037 - Cosgriff v. County Of Winnebago et al.
June 23, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for attorney fees and expenses from defendants Josef Kurlinkus 61 and Kurlinkus Law LLC 63. Both defendants have filed a statement indicating that the motions are unopposed. Accordingly, in view of the mandatory language of Rule 4(b)(2) and the lack of opposition from defendants, it is this Court's Report and Recommendation that plaintiffs motions be granted. Any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by July 11, 2016. Failure to object may constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. See Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260 (7th Cir. 1989). (See attachment for full detail.) Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 6/23/2016: (yxp, )
July 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER: Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") 67 from the magistrate judge recommending that this court grant plaintiffs' motions for attorney's fees and expenses from defendants. The magistrate's recommendation is pursuant to the court's obligation under Rule 4(d)(2) to impose the costs of service including attorney's fees. Furthermore, both defendants filed a statement indicating that the motions are unopposed. Any objection was to be filed by July 11, 2016, and no objection has been received. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985). Having reviewed the R&R and finding no error, the court adopts the R&R in full and grants plaintiffs' motions for attorney's fees and expenses from defendants 61 and 63. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 7/22/2016. Mailed notice (jp, )