Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-1317 - INDIANA PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICES COMMISSION et al v. COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-1317 - INDIANA PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICES COMMISSION et al v. COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
July 21, 2009
PDF | More
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons discussed herein, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 22 is DENIED. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 7/21/2009. (LBK)
April 27, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER granting Individual Pltfs' 85 Motion to Certify Class (See Order for details). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/27/2010. (SWM)
June 28, 2011
PDF | More
ENTRY granting 182 MOTION to Exclude Testimony of Kathryn Burns. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/28/2011. (JD)
October 31, 2011
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Motion filed by Leroy Jeffers: For the reasons explained above, therefore, Mr. Jeffers is not entitled to the relief sought in his motion to commute sentence, and that motion 249 is denied ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/31/2011. (DW)
December 31, 2012
PDF | More
ial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/31/2012.(TRG)ENTRY FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL - The Plaintiffs have prevailed as to their Eighth Amendment claim. Appropriate further proceedings will be conducted as to the relief to which the Plaintiffs are entitled and as to any ancillary matters. For now, no part
July 1, 2015
PDF | More
ENTRY - The filings of Mr. Farmer [dkt 400] and Mr. Harwood [dkt 430] are DENIED. Copies Mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/1/2015. (MGG)
March 24, 2016
PDF | More
ENTRY CONCERNING SELECTED MATTERS - As a result of the hearing conducted on March 18, 2016 and the parties' filings associated with the resolution of this action through the submission and aproval of a Private Settlement Agreement, the parties' Stipulation [dkt 496] is approved. The Court's findings, also issued this date, show that the proposed Private Settlement Agreement is "fair, reasonable, and adequate." Judicial policy favors voluntary settlement of class-action cases. Cotton v. Hinton, 559 F.2d 1326, 1331 (5th Cir. 1977). That policy is fully served by approval of the proposed Private Settlement Agreement. Objections to the proposed Private Settlement Agreement are overruled. By approving the Private Settlement Agreement, moreover, the judgment will also provide for the dismissal of the action without prejudice after a period of three years. Judgment consistent with the foregoing, with the Private Settlement Agreement and with all other pertinent findings shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/24/2016. (JLS)
March 24, 2016
PDF | More
CLOSED JUDGMENT - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Private Settlement Agreement will remain actively in effect for three (3) years from the date of this Order. At that time, absent written agreement as noted in paragraph 71 of the Private Settlement Agreement, this case will automatically be dismissed without prejudice. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, inasmuch as all claims have been resolved against all parties, this Entry shall constitute the Final Judgment in this action and through its issuance the action shall be dismissed without prejudice, subject to all the provisions of the Private Settlement Agreement, which is approved and incorporated herein. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/24/2016.(JLS)