Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-842 - ACLU OF INDIANA - INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW - INDIANAPOLIS CHAPTER, et al v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-842 - ACLU OF INDIANA - INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW - INDIANAPOLIS CHAPTER, et al v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS
August 8, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER denying pltf's 7 Motion to proceed under an anonymous name and to seal affidavit containing actual name. Pltf shall file an amended complaint w/i 14 days that identifies her by name (see Order for other details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/8/09. (SWM)
December 8, 2009
PDF | More
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS: For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 27 is DENIED **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/8/2009. (DWH)
January 4, 2010
PDF | More
ENTRY ON OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE'S ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Doe's Motion to Review and Reverse the Magistrate Judge's Decision 22 is DENIED. Within 14 days of this entry Doe shall file an amended complaint that identifies her by name **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/4/2010.(DWH)
January 29, 2010
PDF | More
ENTRY ON AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 41 Amended Motion to Certify Class. For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Class Certification 41 is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Perdue. Because the Court is unable to determine whether the ACLU has standing, the Court cannot find that the ACLU is an appropriate class representative. Accordingly, the Amended Motion for Class Certification is DENIED as to the ACLU. Within 21 days of the date of this Entry the ACLU shall file a brief in support of its standing. The Defendants shall have 14 days to respond, and no reply is necessary. If the Court finds that the ACLU has standing, and if the organization still wishes to be a class representative, then the ACLU may file an appropriate motion at that time **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/29/2010. (DWH)
March 25, 2010
PDF | More
ENTRY ON STANDING, CLASS REPRESENTATION, AND MOTION TO RECONSIDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the ACLU has standing and is an appropriate class representative. Accordingly, the ACLU's request to be appointed a class representative is GRANTED. In addition, the Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 95 is DENIED **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/25/2010. (DWH)
December 23, 2010
PDF | More
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER - For the reasons set forth, the Court AFFIRMS 124 Magistrate Judge's May 31, 2010 Order, DENYING the Board's 127 Motion to Reconsider. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/23/2010. (JD)
September 20, 2011
PDF | More
ENTRY ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Plaintiffs' Motion (Dkt. 145) is GRANTED with respect to Question 23 but DENIED with respect to Questions 22, 24, and 25. Conversely, the Board's Motion (Dkt. 155) is GRANTED with respect to Questions 22, 24, and 25 but DENIED with respect to Question 23. The parties are directed to notify the Court within seven days if entry of Final Judgment is appropriate. If the parties agree that Final Judgment is appropriate, they are directed to submit a mutually agreeable proposed Final Judgment at that time. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/20/2011. (JD)
September 11, 2015
PDF | More
ENTRY - ON PENDING MOTIONS; This matter is before the Court on several matters: A Motion for Contempt of Court against the Indiana State Board of Law Examiners, Motion for Contempt of Court and Motion for Judgment filed by Interested Party Robert M. Shaw. There has been no order issued in this case which permits Mr. Shaw to obtain any of the relief sought in his post-judgment motions. Accordingly, Mr. Shaw's Motions Filing No. 221 Filing No. 228 and Filing No. 232 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/11/2015. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
January 9, 2018
PDF | More
Entry on Pending Motion - 235 Motion Regarding Indiana Supreme Court is denied. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/9/2018. (MEJ)