Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-189 - USA v. LOMAX et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-189 - USA v. LOMAX et al
August 22, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER - denying 199 Motion to Suppress as to DEMOND GLOVER (2) *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/22/2013.(CKM)
January 10, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 234 Defendant Anthony Lomax's Motion in Limine; denying 281 Defendant Anthony Lomax's Motion for Timely Disclosure of Brady/Giglio Material; and denying 282 Defendant Anthony Lomax's Motion for Bill of Particulars. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/10/2014.(PGS)
September 18, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER - REDUCING SENTENCE - USSC Amendment 782 as to ERIC KING (5), Sentence Reduced to 84 months, time served. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/18/2015. (CKM)
March 9, 2018
PDF | More
Order Denying Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the motion of Brandon Lomax for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied and this action dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Lomax is not entitled to relief on his § 2255 motion. There was no ineffective assistance of counsel and his sentence is not unconstitutional. Accordingly, his motion for relief pursuant to § 2255 is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies a certificate of appealability. (See Order). Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/9/2018.(APD)
March 9, 2018
PDF | More
Order Denying Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the motion of Demond Glover for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied and this action dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Glover is not entitled to relief on his § 2255 motion. There was no ineffective assistance of counsel and his sentence is not unconstitutional. Accordingly, his motion for relief pursuant to § 2255 is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies a certificate of appealability. (See Entry). Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/9/2018.(APD)