Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-241 - GORE v. WOLFE et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-241 - GORE v. WOLFE et al
August 15, 2013
PDF | More
ENTRY - The motion for reconsideration [dkt. 13] does not allege or identify a reasonable effort to secure private counsel and is therefore denied. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/15/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail ) (JKS)
January 24, 2014
PDF | More
ENTRY Dismissing Claims and Directing Further Proceedings - The claims found insufficient and which are dismissed for that reason are the claims against Correctional Medical Services and Corizon. No final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims dismissed in this Entry. The case shall proceed as to the deliberate indifference claims asserted against Dr. Wolfe and Nurse C. Myer. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue and serve process on the remaining defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/24/2014. (copies via US Mail to Plaintiff and defendants as instructed) (JKS)
July 30, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/30/2014 (dist made) (CBU)
December 19, 2014
PDF | More
RNER are dismissed as defendants. The Court is unaware of an independent state law claim of "outrageous conduct." If Gore disagrees with the Court's conclusion as to this claim he has until January 23, 2015, to notify the Court as to the legal basis of this state law claim. The Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Nurse Meyers and Dr. Wolfe may proceed. The state law claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress against Nurse Meyers and Dr. Wolfe may proceed. Defendants Meyers and Wolfe have already appeared in this action. They shall have 21 days from the issuance of this Entry to respond to the amended complaint. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/19/2014.(BGT) Modified on 12/19/2014 (BGT).ENTRY DISCUSSING AMENDED COMPLAINT, DISMISSING INSUFFICIENT CLAIMS, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. The Eighth Amendment claim against defendants TURNER and CORIZON is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff's claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff's state law claim for negligent infliction of emotion distress as to CORIZON and TURNER is dismissed for failure to state a claim. CORIZON and TU
March 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER. The motion to dismiss [dkt. 98] is granted and the State Defendants, the IDOC and the Commissioner of the IDOC, are dismissed as defendants from this action. Although the Court is dismissing the State Defendants and any contract claim against them, this ruling should in no way be read to prohibit Mr. Gore from pursuing a contract claim against Corizon. The clerk is instructed to update the docket to reflect the dismissal of the Indiana Department of Correction and the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/22/2016. (BGT)
October 13, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 136 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 10/27/2016 re 126 MOTION for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff's 137 Motion for Appointment of an Expert Witness. Given the age of the case, further extensions of the briefing schedule should not be anticipated.(S.O.). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/13/2016. (MAC)
February 7, 2017
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - For reasons stated in this entry, the defendants' motion for summary judgment 126 is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/7/2017. (JRB)