Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-298 - PERFORMANCE DYNAMICS, INC. v. FLYNN et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-298 - PERFORMANCE DYNAMICS, INC. v. FLYNN et al
July 18, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting 104 Motion to enforce mediation agreement. The Defendants have failed to provide the Court with reason to find the April 20, 2015, Agreement unenforceable. The parties shall submit to the Court a proposed injunction within 14 days of the date of this Entry. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/18/2016. (CBU)
March 3, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 120 Motion for Reconsideration in its entirety. The Court again directs the parties to submit a proposed injunction within 10 days of the date of this Entry. If the parties do not do so, the Court will rely on and evaluate the injunction contained in the Agreement. No extensions of time to file the proposed injunction shall be granted without good cause shown. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/3/2017. (CBU)
August 25, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY REGARDING INJUNCTION 124 - The Court declines to enter an injunction that, from the outset, presents problems of interpretation and enforcement. It was certainly possible for the parties to draft an appropriate injunction, but they have failed to do so. The Court's determination that the terms of the mediation agreement are enforceable is undisturbed by this Entry, i.e., the agreement set forth in pages one through three of Docket Number 108-1 remains in effect. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/25/2017.(JDC)