Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-1169 - EADS v. USA

Download Files


Document in Context
14-1169 - EADS v. USA
May 17, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the effort of Christopher Eads to show otherwise through his motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 fails. No evidentiary hearing is warranted. The Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Dkt. 1) is DENIED and a copy of this Entry shall be docketed in the underlying criminal action, Case No. 1:11-cr-239-TWP-KPF. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court finds that Eads has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/17/2017.(JLS)
July 11, 2017
PDF | More
y Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/11/2017. (MAC)ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS. ORDER denying as moot 34 Motion for order of transcript; denying 26 Motion to supplement; denying 28 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (USCA #17-2193). (S.O.). Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed b