Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1370 - BRIDGEWATER et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1370 - BRIDGEWATER et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
March 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - Defendants' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Additionally, Plaintiffs' 62 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Court GRANTS summary judgment in Defendants' favor on Plaintiffs' § 1983 unlawful stop and search claim against Detectives Osborne and Kessie, Plaintiffs' state law false imprisonment claim against the City, and Plaintiffs' intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against the City. The Court DENIES summary judgment on all remaining claims. No partial final judgment shall issue. The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Ms. Bridgewater and Detective Kessie as parties, as the Court has granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants on all of Ms. Bridgewater's claims, and on all claims against Detective Kessie. The following claims remain for trial: Mr. Bridgewater's § 1983 excessive force claim against Detective Osborne and Mr. Bridgewater's state law battery claim against the City. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the remaining parties to address the possibility of resolving the remaining claims prior to the June 13, 2016 trial scheduled in this matter. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/22/2016. (GSO)
September 26, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiff may not present any of his medical providers or Hannah Slack to testify at trial; Plaintiff may present the medical records contained at Filing No. 104-4, in that form only, as long as he provides the Court with a certification fTestimony of Anthony Bridgewater and/or Crystal Bridgewater is DENIED. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/26/2016. (GSO)or those records; Defendants' Motion in Limine #4 is GRANTED IN PART, their Motion in Limine #6 is GRANTED, and their Motion in Limine #7 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth above; Plaintiff's objection relating to Defendants' introduction of the police reports at trial is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to assert the objection at trial, when the Court can examine the contents of the reports; and Plaintiff's 105 Motion to Preclude Use or Reference to Deposition