Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1215 - FROSCHAUER v. WADLEIGH et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1215 - FROSCHAUER v. WADLEIGH et al
November 14, 2016
PDF | More
ENTRY Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - The 112 motion for joinder to Defendant Wadleigh's motion for summary judgment is granted. Froschauer's 117 motion to object and 119 motion to stop further proceedings are each denied. While Froschauer argues that Defendants Kane, Loveridge, and Thornton should have responded sooner to the complaint, service was not fully effected upon them and they are therefore not in default. Because their request for summary judgment is based on the same facts and law as Wadleigh's motion for summary judgment, they are granted leave to join in Wadleigh's motion. Defendant Wadleigh's 86 motion for summary judgment is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/14/2016. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. (GSO)