Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-2056 - PHARES v. BERRYHILL


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-2056 - PHARES v. BERRYHILL
March 27, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW - For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that the ALJ adequately addressed Phares' objection that U.S. Publishing is not reliable, and the ALJ discussed all of Phares' mental limitations when finding that Phares could "concentrate and persist for two hours at a time." The Court, however, REMANDS the ALJ's decision for the sole purpose of addressing Phares' objection regarding inconsistencies between the VE's testimony and the DOT. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/27/2017.(JLS)