Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-001 - USA v. JETT et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-001 - USA v. JETT et al
August 2, 2016
PDF | More
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT EARL WALKER'S MOTION TO SEVER - Walker contends that while joining him for trial with co-defendant Damian McKissick ("McKissick") was not improper under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b), severance is appropriate under Rule 14 and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) because of prejudice that would result from a joint trial. For the reasons stated below, Walker's Motion to Sever is DENIED. **See Order** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/2/2016.(JLS)
October 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S 76 MOTION IN LIMINE - To assist the Court in deciding the pending Motion in Limine in advance of trial, the Government is directed to supplement its Motion with additional argument and information regarding the probative value of the prior criminal convictions weighed against their prejudicial effect. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/27/2016. (JLS)ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S 76 MOTION IN LIMINE - To assist the Court in deciding the pending Motion in Limine in advance of trial, the Government is directed to supplement its Motion with additional argument and information regarding the probative value of the prior criminal convictions weighed against their prejudicial effect. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/27/2016. (JLS)ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S 76 MOTION IN LIMINE - To assist the Court in deciding the pending Motion in Limine in advance of trial, the Government is directed to supplement its Motion with additional argument and information regarding the probative value of the prior criminal convictions weighed against their prejudicial effect. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/27/2016. (JLS)
January 4, 2017
PDF | More
MOTION Objecting to Government Use of F.R.E. 404 Information by DAMION MCKISSICK (2). (Beitz, Gwendolyn)
January 30, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No 93) - tTe Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 93). The Court DENIES the Government's motion to admit McKissick's alleged co-conspirator statement, unless McKissick testifies at trial. The Court GRANTS the Government's request to introduce McKissick's post Miranda statements and Jett's statements. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)ENTRY on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No 93) - tTe Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 93). The Court DENIES the Government's motion to admit McKissick's alleged co-conspirator statement, unless McKissick testifies at trial. The Court GRANTS the Government's request to introduce McKissick's post Miranda statements and Jett's statements. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)ENTRY on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No 93) - tTe Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 93). The Court DENIES the Government's motion to admit McKissick's alleged co-conspirator statement, unless McKissick testifies at trial. The Court GRANTS the Government's request to introduce McKissick's post Miranda statements and Jett's statements. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)
January 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 76) - the Government's Motion in Limine to admit evidence of prior convictions for impeachment purposes is DENIED as to the Defendants' convictions for bank robbery and GRANTED as to Defendants' conviction for carrying or use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)ORDER on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 76) - the Government's Motion in Limine to admit evidence of prior convictions for impeachment purposes is DENIED as to the Defendants' convictions for bank robbery and GRANTED as to Defendants' conviction for carrying or use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)ORDER on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 76) - the Government's Motion in Limine to admit evidence of prior convictions for impeachment purposes is DENIED as to the Defendants' convictions for bank robbery and GRANTED as to Defendants' conviction for carrying or use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)
January 30, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 124) - Because McKissick does not object to the Government's Motion, the Court GRANTS the Government's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)ENTRY on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 124) - Because McKissick does not object to the Government's Motion, the Court GRANTS the Government's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)ENTRY on Government's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 124) - Because McKissick does not object to the Government's Motion, the Court GRANTS the Government's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2017.(TRG)
February 1, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS - For the reasons set forth above, the Court determines that the Government has not met its burden and GRANTS McKissick's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 90 at 4-5). (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017.(JLS)ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS - For the reasons set forth above, the Court determines that the Government has not met its burden and GRANTS McKissick's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 90 at 4-5). (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017.(JLS)ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS - For the reasons set forth above, the Court determines that the Government has not met its burden and GRANTS McKissick's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 90 at 4-5). (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017.(JLS)
February 1, 2017
PDF | More
AMENDED 132 ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE (Filing Nos. 76 and 87) - An order in limine is not a final, appealable order. If the Government believes that evidence excluded by this Order becomes relevant or otherwise admissible during the course of the trial, counsel may approach the bench and request a hearing outside the presence of the jury. For the reasons described above, the Government's Motion's in Limine (Filing No. 76 and Filing No. 87) to admit evidence of prior convictions for impeachment purposes are DENIED as to the Defendants' convictions for bank robbery and GRANTED as to Defendants' conviction for carrying or use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017. (JLS) Modified on 2/1/2017 (JLS).AMENDED 132 ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE (Filing Nos. 76 and 87) - An order in limine is not a final, appealable order. If the Government believes that evidence excluded by this Order becomes relevant or otherwise admissible during the course of the trial, counsel may approach the bench and request a hearing outside the presence of the jury. For the reasons described above, the Government's Motion's in Limine (Filing No. 76 and Filing No. 87) to admit evidence of prior convictions for impeachment purposes are DENIED as to the Defendants' convictions for bank robbery and GRANTED as to Defendants' conviction for carrying or use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017. (JLS) Modified on 2/1/2017 (JLS).AMENDED 132 ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE (Filing Nos. 76 and 87) - An order in limine is not a final, appealable order. If the Government believes that evidence excluded by this Order becomes relevant or otherwise admissible during the course of the trial, counsel may approach the bench and request a hearing outside the presence of the jury. For the reasons described above, the Government's Motion's in Limine (Filing No. 76 and Filing No. 87) to admit evidence of prior convictions for impeachment purposes are DENIED as to the Defendants' convictions for bank robbery and GRANTED as to Defendants' conviction for carrying or use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017. (JLS) Modified on 2/1/2017 (JLS).
February 3, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY ON GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION re 141 Motion as to DUPRECE JETT (1), DAMION MCKISSICK (2), EARL WALKER (3). Having reviewed the proffered statement (Filing No. 144), the Court determines that it comports with its prior ruling and applicable law. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/3/2017.(JLS)ENTRY ON GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION re 141 Motion as to DUPRECE JETT (1), DAMION MCKISSICK (2), EARL WALKER (3). Having reviewed the proffered statement (Filing No. 144), the Court determines that it comports with its prior ruling and applicable law. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/3/2017.(JLS)ENTRY ON GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION re 141 Motion as to DUPRECE JETT (1), DAMION MCKISSICK (2), EARL WALKER (3). Having reviewed the proffered statement (Filing No. 144), the Court determines that it comports with its prior ruling and applicable law. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/3/2017.(JLS)