Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-096 - GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-096 - GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
April 5, 2016
PDF | More
ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Any claim against the Indiana Department of Corrections or the Indiana Women's Prison must be dismissed because the Eleventh Amendment immunity bars suits against states and their agencies regardless of the relief sought, whether damages or injunctive relief. The plaintiff's claims against Julie Murphy, David Hinchman, and Corizon, shall proceed as claims that these defendants exhibited deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Murphy, Hinchman, and Corizon in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copies to Parties via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/5/2016.(JLS)
March 15, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY - This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Susan Grund's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. [Dkt 39.] The Motion is denied. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/15/2017. (RSF)
September 6, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons stated herein, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 36, is GRANTED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/6/2017. (MAC)