Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-202 - HAMPTON v. KNIGHT et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-202 - HAMPTON v. KNIGHT et al
April 14, 2016
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Based on the foregoing screening, the plaintiff's First Amendment claims shall proceed. Any Eighth Amendment claim alleged by the plaintiff based on the same facts is dismissed. See Conyers v. Abitz, 416 F.3d 580, 586 (7th Cir. 2005) ("Constitutional claims are to be addressed under the most applicable provision."). The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to the defendants in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copies to Petitioner and Respondent via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/14/2016. (JLS)
August 2, 2016
PDF | More
Entry Denying Motion to Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status - Accordingly, the ruling granting Hampton permission to proceed in forma pauperis was appropriate and the motion to revoke in forma pauperis status [dkt 29] is DENIED. **See Order** Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/2/2016. (JLS)
March 14, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - For the foregoing reasons, Cox's motion for summary judgment [Dkt. 40] is GRANTED. Judgment dismissing this action without prejudice shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy sent to Edward Hampton via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/14/2017. (JLS)