Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-391 - BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-391 - BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY Regarding Jurisdiction. Defendants Indiana State Board of Law Examiners - Barbara L. Brugnaux, Michael M. Yoder, Jon B. Laramore, Gary K. Kemper, Charlotte F. Westerhaus-Renfrow, Michael J. Jenuwine, Kathryn H. Burroughs, Jeffry A. Lind, and Shelice R. Tolbert - and John and Jane Does of the Indiana State Board of Law Examiners are DISMISSED as defendants in this action. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket to indicate that the State ex rel. Indiana Supreme Court is the only remaining defendant in this matter. The State is directed to respond to the claims remaining in the Second Amended Complaint, specifically, the Plaintiff's claims regarding the constitutionality of the bar examination and Admission and Discipline Rule 2.1, by no later than 21 days from the date of this Entry. This response may, of course, be in the form of an answer or a motion to dismiss. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/13/2017.(MAC)
September 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Reconsideration For Leave to the third amended complaint; denying as moot 43 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Hearing set for 10/26/2017 at 10:00 AM in room #202, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge William T. Lawrence. If any party believes more time is needed, it should file a notice with the Court within seven days of the date of this Entry. On or before Thursday, October 12, 2017, the parties shall file lists of the witnesses and exhibits they intend to present at the hearing Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/21/2017. (JDC)
November 17, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 62 Motion to Stay Younger Abstention Ruling for lack of subject matter jurisdiction all of the Plaintiff's claims in the Third Amended Complaint, except for his claim regarding the constitutionality of Admission and Discipline Rule 2.1, as to which judgment will be entered as a matter of law in favor of the Defendants. DENIES the Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration Dkt. No. 39 (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/17/2017. (JDC)