Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1373 - MARAMAN v. CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1373 - MARAMAN v. CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA et al
July 28, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS - This action must be dismissed in federal court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and hence the Rule 12(b)(1) portion of 31 Motion to Dismiss must be GRANTED. Because the federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it has not ruled on the merits of the remaining independent claims. These claims are dismissed without prejudice. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/28/2017. (LBT)