Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-1855 - SISK v. PENCE et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-1855 - SISK v. PENCE et al
August 15, 2016
PDF | More
Entry Denying Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Dismissal of Action - With due respect to Sisk, unfortunately, because he has three strikes, he is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. He was given a period of time in which to pay the filing fee for this action, but has failed to do so. Further, because has been notified of his three-strike status on several occasions, including in the Entry of July 14, 2016, in this case, but still moved to proceed in forma pauperis this action must now be dismissed. The Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 4) is DENIED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. **SEE ORDER** Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/15/2016. (JLS)