Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2124 - BILBIJA et al v. LANE


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2124 - BILBIJA et al v. LANE
August 19, 2016
PDF | More
ties. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/19/2016.(JLS)ENTRY ON JURISDICTION - Therefore, the Defendant is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the citizenship of each of the par
May 10, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 44 - Lane's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part (Filing No. 44). The Bilbijas' claim for conflict of interest is dismissed. Their claim for legal malpractice against Lane may proceed to trial.(See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/10/2018. (NAD)
July 2, 2018
PDF | More
ENTRY ON MOTION IN LIMINE - This matter is before the Court on Defendant Christopher T. Lane's ("Lane") Motion in Limine (Filing No. 63) to exclude certain evidence and testimony at trial. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Lane's Motion in Limine (Filing No. [63)]. An order in limine is not a final, appealable order. If the parties believe that evidence excluded by this Order becomes relevant or otherwise admissible during the course of the trial, counsel may approach the bench and request a hearing outside the presence of the jury. Likewise, if the parties believe that specific evidence is inadmissible during the course of the trial, counsel may raise specific objections to that evidence. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/2/2018. (NAD)