Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2316 - ARMSTRONG v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2316 - ARMSTRONG v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
September 1, 2016
PDF | More
Entry Denying Motion for Counsel, Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's motion for counsel [dkt. 2] is denied as premature. The plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed for each of the reasons set fortuot;). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/1/2016.(JLS) Modified on 9/1/2016 (JLS).h above. The plaintiff shall have through September 29, 2016, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. See Luevano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 722 F.3d 1014, 1022 (7th Cir. 2013) ("Without at least an opportunity to amend or to respond to an order to show cause, an IFP applicant's case could be tossed out of court without giving the applicant any timely notice or opportunity to be heard to clarify, contest, or simply request leave to amend.&q