Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2605 - SCARR v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2605 - SCARR v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.
January 25, 2018
PDF | More
9], 127, 132, 137, and 138). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 1/25/2018.(SWM) Modified on 1/26/2018 (SWM).REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 77, 79, 89 and 91 and ORDER on Related Motion: The Magistrate Judge DENIES all pending, non-dispositive motions (Docket Nos. [10
March 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court, having reviewed de novo the parties' arguments in the Motions to Dismiss, the Report and Recommendation's findings and authorities on each point, and Scarr's Objections thereto, concludes that the Magistrate Judge's analysis is correct and her holdings are sound. Fair and meaningful consideration was given to Scarr's objections and he has demonstrated no error in the Magistrate Judge's order. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 142). Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Filing No. 77, Filing No. 79, Filing No. 89 and Filing No. 91) are GRANTED. And, to the extent the Amended Complaint (Filing No. 64) seeks to challenge the state court foreclosure judgment or seeks rescission of Scarr's mortgage loan, those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but to the extent any of the claims are not barred by Rooker-Feldman, those claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim based on claim preclusion or issue preclusion. In addition, the Court finds no errors in the Magistrate Judge's Order dismissing all pending non-dispositive motions (Filing No. 109, Filing No. 127, Filing No. 132, Filing No. 137, and Filing No. 138). The Court therefore OVERRULES the objections and Filing No. 109, Filing No. 127, Filing No. 132, Filing No. 137, and Filing No. 138 are DISMISSED. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/14/2018.(BRR)