Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-173 - HILL v. BEDWELL, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-173 - HILL v. BEDWELL, et al
January 23, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY Discussing Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claims, and Directing Further Proceedings - The clerk shall update the docket to reflect the dismissal of defendants Hoefling and Littlejohn. The claims against the remaining defendants shall proceed.It is unclear from the record whether the defendants' motion for enlargement of time to respond to the complaint was ruled on in the state court. The defendants shall have through February 10, 2017, in which to respond to the complaint. The defendants shall also have through February 10, 2017, in which to respond to Mr. Hill's request for preliminary injunctive relief. Mr. Hill will then have twenty-one (21) days in which to respond only to the defendants' response to his request for preliminary injunctive relief. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/23/2017.(JLS)
April 3, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY Discussing Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunctive Relief - At this preliminary stage of the litigation, the Court finds that Mr. Hill has not shown that he is likely to succeed on the merits or that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm if preliminary relief is not granted. He has not shown that immediate injunctive relief is necessary to avoid serious physical harm. The extraordinary relief sought by Mr. Hill in his request for a preliminary injunction is denied. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/3/2017.(JLS)