Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-439 - KOORSEN et al v. BRIAN FULLER INSURANCE CO. et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-439 - KOORSEN et al v. BRIAN FULLER INSURANCE CO. et al
March 13, 2017
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Motion and Notice of Conflict of Interest, Dismissing Action, and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - In his complaint, the plaintiff alleges that his insurance agent submitted a claim without his consent for damage allegedly caused by Direct TV. Because this claim does not allege a violation of federal law and the plaintiff did not allege diversity of citizenship, the Court noted in the Entry of February 14, 2017, that it did not have jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claim. Dkt. 4. The plaintiff was directed to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.The plaintiff has not shown that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over his claim. Accordingly, the action is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Entry of February 14, 2017. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/13/2017. (RSF)