Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-1035 - HEARTLAND CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC et al. v. DINEEQUITY, INC., et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-1035 - HEARTLAND CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC et al. v. DINEEQUITY, INC., et al
January 18, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - denying Defendant's 15 Motion to Dismiss; *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/18/2018. (CKM)
July 25, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER denying IN PART Plaintiff's 76 Motion to Compel. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/25/2018. (SWM)
August 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ON DOCUMENTS REVIEWED IN CAMERA: Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel production of certain emails Defendants withheld as privileged. [Filing No. 76.] The Court partially resolved this issue in an earlier order [Filing No. 94], but ordered Defendants to submit nine of the contested emails for in camera review because the privilege log did not make the attorney's roll in the communication clear. The Court grants in part Plaintiffs' motion to compel. [Filing No. 76.] Defendants must produce the January 22, 2013, emails sent at 12:45 p.m. and 1:18 p.m. that are contained in Doc. IDs 780 and 1110. Defendants also must produce the one-sentence responsive email contained in Doc. ID 1011. Both productions must be made within seven days of this order. However, Defendants need not produce Doc. IDs. 552, 693, 789, 830, 1035, or 1088. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/14/2018.(SWM)