Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-1321 - GOATLEY v. WAL-MART et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-1321 - GOATLEY v. WAL-MART et al
May 2, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY ON JURISDICTION - Therefore, Defendants are ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the citizenship of the parties. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/2/2017.(JLS)
October 12, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Remand. Within thirty days after Defendants received discovery responses disclosing that more than $75,000.00 was in controversy, they filed their Notice of Removal. It was not clear to them before receipt of those responses that the case was removable. See order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/12/2017. (MEJ)