Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-1415 - NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-1415 - NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
March 30, 2018
PDF | More
ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and the Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The motions were briefed in Cause No. 1:14-1734-WTL-DML, and supplemental briefs were filed in this case. All citations to the record in this Entry refer to the record in Cause No. 1:14-1734-WTL-DML unless otherwise noted. The Court, being duly advised, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART both motions for the reasons and to the extent set forth in this Entry. Noble Roman's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 158) is GRANTED as to Hattenhauer's counterclaims under the WCPA and the WFIPA and as to Hattenhauer's counterclaim relating to Section V(7) of the Franchise Agreements. It is DENIED in all other respects. Hattenhauer's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 160) is GRANTED as to all of Noble Roman's claims and GRANTED as to liability as to all of Hattenhauer's counterclaims except its claims under the WCPA and the WFIPA and its claims relating to Section V(7) of the Franchise Agreements, on which it is DENIED. The parties shall confer and file a notice setting forth how they wish to proceed in this case--specifically, whether a trial is necessary on the issue of Hattenhauer's damages--within 28 days of the date of this Entry. The Court encourages the parties to contact the Magistrate Judge to request a settlement conference in this case if they believe it would be useful. (See Entry). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/30/2018.(APD)