Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3096 - EDWARDS v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3096 - EDWARDS v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC et al
March 13, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 42 MOTION for Sanctions filed by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and re 51 Cross Motion for Sanctions filed by BHC. For the above reasons, the undersigned recommends that Experian's Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 42) and BHC's Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 51) be denied. Any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk in accordance with28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Failure to file timely objections within fourteen days after service shall constitute waiver of subsequent review absent a showing of good cause for such failure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 3/13/2018.(TMB)
April 11, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION - On March 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Matthew Brookman entered his report and recommendation on defendant Experian's motion for determination of bad faith and sanctions, and Mr. Edwards's cross-motion for sanctions [Doc. No. 66]. The parties had fourteen days to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, and those fourteen days have passed with no objections being filed. The court now substantially adopts the Magistrate's recommendation as follows: Experian's motion for sanctions [Doc. No. 42] is DENIED; and Mr. Edwards's motion for cross-sanctions [Doc. No. 51] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr on 4/11/2018.(BRR)