Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3288 - ROWE v. DILLOW et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3288 - ROWE v. DILLOW et al
October 24, 2017
PDF | More
ENTRY Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to the defendants in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/24/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff, Defendants, and Douglass Bitner) (MEJ) (Main Document 6 replaced on 10/24/2017) (MEJ).
January 22, 2018
PDF | More
ENTRY - 13 Motion for Leave to File is granted. The clerk shall re-docket the proposed supplemental complaint (dkt 13-2) as the supplemental complaint. Defendants Gard, Thompson, and the GEO Group have already appeared in this action. They shall have twenty-one days to file an Answer to the Supplemental Complaint. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendant R. Jackson in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the supplemental complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/22/2018. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff and R. Jackson) (MEJ)
March 13, 2018
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Motion for a TRO and Preliminary Injunction - Plaintiff Jeffrey Allen Rowe has a cyst on his testicle which causes him severe pain and prevents him from doing many daily activities. He alleges that he has been denied treatment for this condition in a number of ways. He seeks a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction ordering the defendants to provide him with particular pain medication and to provide him effective treatment for this condition. Because the standards for a temporary restraining order are essentially identical and because the defendants have had a full opportunity to respond, the Court treats the motion as one for a preliminary injunction. The defendants argue that Rowe's claims for injunctive relief are moot because he is now receiving the pain medication that he requests. Because Rowe is now receiving this medication, his request for it is denied as moot. The motion for a preliminary injunction, dkt. 11, is denied. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/13/2018. (BRR)