Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3320 - LANE v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3320 - LANE v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
February 1, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - This matter is before the Court on Defendant Indianapolis Public Schools' ("IPS") Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ("Motion to Dismiss"). [Filing No. 12.] IPS seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Toni Yvonne Lane's Complaint, [Filing No. 1], which was filed pro se, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies in part and grants in part IPS' Motion to Dismiss. Because Ms. Lane conceded in her Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss that Ms. Lane is not seeking any relief under Title VII, [Filing No. 24 at 3], IPS' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Ms. Lane's Title VII claims is GRANTED. The Court will only address IPS' arguments relating to the sufficiency of Ms. Lane's ADA claim. For the reasons stated herein, IPS' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Ms. Lane's ADA claim, [Filing No. 12], is DENIED. For the foregoing reasons, IPS' Motion to Dismiss [12.] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Ms. Lane is hereby ordered to file an Amended Complaint by February 15, 2018. Defendant need only file a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/1/2018. (APD)