Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-103 - BOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-103 - BOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
January 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and denying for Failure to State a Claim. Bolden's claim under the Eighth Amendment may proceed against the Defendants. Further, the Defendants concede that if Bolden "has properly alleged a cause of action for an eighth amendment violation, then he has properly stated a claim for declaratory relief." Accordingly, and based on the reasons set forth above, the Defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt. no. 31) is DENIED in its entirety. **SEE ORDER** Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/6/2015. (AH)
March 8, 2016
PDF | More
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - This cause is before the Court on the Defendants' 99 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, GRANTS the Defendants' Motion. The Plaintiff also has moved for summary judgment. That 102 motion is DENIED AS MOOT in light of this Entry. The Defendants' 116 Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dr. Stuart Friedman at Trial likewise is DENIED AS MOOT, as is the Plaintiff's 126 Motion for Leave to File Surreply to the Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of that motion. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/8/2016. (GSO)