Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-080 - ROSALES v. CORIZON MEDICAL, INC. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-080 - ROSALES v. CORIZON MEDICAL, INC. et al
April 25, 2016
PDF | More
signated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Dr. Neil Martin and Corizon in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/25/2016. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (GSO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2016: # (1) Distribution List) (GSO).ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Rosales's claims for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs shall proceed against Dr. Neil Martin and Corizon. All other defendants shall be terminated. The clerk is de
August 12, 2016
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Oscar Rosales, an inmate at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 alleging that the defendants have failed to properly treat his knee, back, and neck pain and his bladder issues. He has filed an Amended Complaint in which he alleges violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. Based on the filing of the Amended Complaint, the motion to dismiss 17 is denied as moot. The claims alleged in the Amended Complaint shall proceed as directed in this Entry. Rosales's claims for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs shall proceed against Dr. Neil Martin, Dr. Pulkit J. Patel, Dr. Mitcheff, and Corizon. His claim under the Rehabilitation Act shall proceed against the Commissioner of the IDOC in his official capacity. All other defendants shall be terminated. Corizon and Dr. Martin have already appeared in this action. In addition, Corizon and Dr. Martin filed an Answer to the Amended Complaint before the screening of the Amended Complaint was complete. Accordingly, the Answer to the Amended Complaint 29 is stricken as premature. Corizon and Dr. Martin shall have twenty-one days from the date of this Entry to Answer the Amended Complaint as screened. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Dr. Pulkit Patel, Dr. Mitcheff, and the Commission of the IDOC in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Entry.) Copies to parties pursuant to the distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/12/2016.(BRR)
September 29, 2016
PDF | More
Entry - Denying 22 Motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/29/2016. (RSF)
July 7, 2017
PDF | More
Entry Granting Motion to Set Aside Default and Denying Motion for Default Judgment - For the foregoing reasons, Dr. Patel's motion to set aside default, dkt. 96, is granted and Rosales's motion for default judgment, dkt. 99, is denied (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/7/2017. (DW)
April 4, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for [178, 179, 180, and 182] Defendants are directed to comply with any remaining terms of the parties' settlement agreement, and thereafter notify the Court of such compliance, at which time this matter will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/4/2018.(CBU)