Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-397 - HUERTA v. EWING et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-397 - HUERTA v. EWING et al
May 19, 2017
PDF | More
MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson: On May 17, 2017, the Court held a hearing on the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Joint Stipulation and Class Certification, [Filing No. 37]. Plaintiffs were present by counsel Michael Sutherlin. Defendant Sheriff Greg Ewing was present in person and by counsel Craig McKee, David Friedrich, and Michael Wright. The remaining Defendants were present by counsel David Friedrich and Michael Wright. The court reporter was Jean Knepley. The Court DENIES IN PART WITH EXPLANATION the Joint Motion to Approve Stipulation and Class Certification to the extent it requests approval of the Joint Stipulation. [Filing No. 37] The Court, therefore, ACCEPTS the Proposed Joint Stipulation, [Filing No. 44] The Court GRANTS IN PART the Joint Motion to Approve Joint Stipulation and Class Certification, [Filing No. 37], to the extent that it seeks class certification, and likewise GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, [Filing No. 10]. The joint stipulation filed on March 27, 2017 [Filing No. 36] is WITHDRAWN. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, [Filing No. 12], remains pending. (SEE ORDER FOR MORE DETAILS.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (Court Reporter Jean Knepley.) (Attachments: # (1) Class Notice)(MRI)
August 18, 2017
PDF | More
MARGINAL ENTRY denying as moot 47 Motion for Preliminary Injunction - In light of Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 65, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction Hearing, 47. The Court may reconsider if necessary. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/18/2017. (JRB) (Main Document 66 replaced on 8/18/2017) (JRB).
August 18, 2017
PDF | More
MARGINAL ENTRY denying as moot 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Because Plaintiffs have filed an Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 65, their Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 12, is DENIED AS MOOT AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/18/2017. (JRB)
February 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for the Appointment of a Three Judge Panel, 95. To the extent that circumstances change which would support the appointment of a three-judge panel, Plaintiffs may re-file their motion (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/8/2018. (DW)