Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

17-034 - SHAKE v. SMILEY et al

Download Files


Document in Context
17-034 - SHAKE v. SMILEY et al
March 21, 2018
PDF | More
Entry Granting Defendants' Unopposed Motions for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Jerry Donald Shake filed this civil rights action based on circumstances that arose while he was a pretrial detainee at the Vigo County Jail. Mr. Shake alleges that defendants Dee Smiley and Susan Streeter were deliberately indifferent to his skin condition (an allergic reaction and scabies) in violation of his constitutional rights. Defendants now seek resolution of the claims alleged against them through summary judgment. They argue that Mr. Shake has failed to produce any evidence that his treatment for an allergic reaction or scabies violated his Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment rights. Mr. Shake has not identified a genuine issue of material fact as to his claims in this case and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendant Susan Streeter's motion for summary judgment filed October 31, 2017, and defendant Dee Smiley's motion for summary judgment filed November 15, 2017, dkts 29 and 35, are granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copies to parties pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/21/2018. (RSF)