Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-205 - OSTACK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-205 - OSTACK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
May 12, 2017
PDF | More
Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 3] is granted. Ostack has adequately alleged a failure to protect claim against the two unknown officers he approached in dorm 18 North, on March 19, 2017, at approximately 2:30 p.m. This claim is alleges a violation of the Eighth Amendment and is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. This is the only viable claim identified by the Court. All other claims are dismissed. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court he shall have through June 7, 2017, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is directed to add the Superintendent of Putnamville Correctional Facility in his official capacity only as an interested party on the docket. The clerk is designated to serve the Indiana Department of Correction employee electronically. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/12/2017. (RSF)
February 2, 2018
PDF | More
Entry Discussing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment - The defendants have shown that Mr. Ostack failed to avail himself of all administrative remedies before filing this civil action. Therefore, the defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 33, is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/2/2018. (DW)