Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-092 - HURT et al v. VANTLIN et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-092 - HURT et al v. VANTLIN et al
September 24, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' OBJECTION. The Court GRANTS the Defendants' requests to join Defendant Wise and Jones' Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Qualified HIPAA Protective Order. [Filing No. 65; Filing No. 67.] The Court SUSTAINS Defendants' Objection, [Filing No. 64], and VACATES the previously issued Qualified HIPAA Protective Order, [Filing No. 60]. The Court will issue an Amended Protective Order that does not contain Paragraphs 3(b), 3(d), and 3(e) of the previously issued Protective Order. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/24/2015. (BGT)
October 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Defendants Zachary Jones and Matthew Wise's Motion for Joinder, [Filing No. 72], and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, [Filing No. 69]. No final judgment shall issue at this time. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file an Initial Statement of Claims by November 9, 2015, setting forth which claims they intend to pursue in light of the Court's Order, specifically identifying which defendants they are pursuing each claim against. The Court makes the following rulings on arguments presented by the parties' motions. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/6/2015. (BGT)
January 26, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. [Filing No. 126.] Because the Court has ruled on this issue, it rejects Defendants Wise and Jones' argument that the upcoming settlement conference scheduled for February 19, 2016 should be continued. [Filing No. 138.] The assigned Magistrate Judge will address the timing of that conference, the pending Motion to Vacate Case Management Plan deadlines, [Filing No. 139], and any other scheduling requests at the telephonic conference set for February 2, 2016, [Filing No. 144]. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/26/2016. (BGT)
January 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying 134 Motion for Protective Order. For the foregoing reasons, the City's Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. Defendant will have fourteen (14) days from this entry to correspond with Plaintiffs and set a time for the taking of these depositions. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 1/27/2016. (TMB)
May 25, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiffs' 206 Objection is OVERRULED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court REMANDS this matter to the magistrate judge for further findings and to elaborate the basis for his decision, such that this Court can apply the requisite standard of review should Plaintiffs renew their objection. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/25/2016. (GSO)
June 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 174 Motion to Compel Certain "Post-Incident" Discovery from Defendant City of Evansville. (SEE ORDER) Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 6/6/2016. (NRN)
July 20, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - On June 6, 2016, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued an Order, granting in part and denying in part a Motion to Compel previously filed by Plaintiffs. [Filing No. 212 (granting in part and denying in part Filing No. 174).] The Defendants related to the City of Evansville (the "Evansville Defendants") object to a portion of the Magistrate Judge's Order requiring them to answer three interrogatories. [Filing No. 212.] Plaintiffs oppose the Evansville Defendants' Objection, and ask this Court to order the City of Evansville1 (the "City") to produce the interrogatory responses within 14 days. [Filing No. 226.] For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the Evansville Defendants' Objection. [Filing No. 218 (unredacted sealed version of motion); Filing No. 220 (redacted public version of motion). For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES the Evansville Defendants' Objection. [Filing No. 218.] Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's Order, [Filing No. 212 at 5], Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel as to Plaintiffs' Third Set of Interrogatories Nos. 5, 6, and 7 is GRANTED. The City is ORDERED to comply within fourteen days of the date of this Order. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/20/2016. (BRR)
September 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Defendants' requests for additional pages to support their forthcoming motions for summary judgment. [Filing No. 247; Filing No. 249.] Defendants Jones and Wise are granted leave to file a supporting summary judgment brief of up to 50 pages. The Evansville Defendants are granted leave to file a supporting summary judgment brief of up to 50 pages. Plaintiffs may file briefs up to 50 pages in response to either of these motions. Additionally, all parties are ORDERED to review the Court's Practices and Procedures before any summary judgment filing, particularly Appendix A, which sets forth a detailed guide for how to file and cite summary judgment exhibits. [Filing No. 45 at 16-18.] (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/27/2016. (JRB)
March 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Dr. Burrows-Beckham's Motion for Summary Judgment and enters summary judgment in her favor on all of Plaintiffs' claims against her. [Filing No. 255.] The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the EPD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 254.] The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the KSP Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 256.] The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE by March 31, 2017 why Debbie should not be terminated as a party to this litigation on the Court's docket. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. (See Order for additional details.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/16/2017. (RSF)
May 3, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS the pending Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal, 333, and DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Defendants' Appeal as Frivolous, 343. This action is hereby STAYED. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/3/2017. **Emailed to USCA re #17-1771 & #17-1777** (JRB) Modified on 5/4/2017 (MAT).