Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-118 - LUNEY v. USA

Download Files


Document in Context
16-118 - LUNEY v. USA
February 16, 2018
PDF | More
Entry Denying Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - Luney has not shown that he is entitled to relief under § 2255 and his motion is denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue and a copy of this Entry shall be docketed in No. 4:99-cv-13-SEB-VTW-3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2255 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the court finds that Luney has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/16/2018 (copy mailed to petitioner).(LBT)