Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-2222 - Harlow et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-2222 - Harlow et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
September 2, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 13 Motion to Dismiss as to Count I and denying as moot as to Counts II-V. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 9/2/2008. (ses)
December 10, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 38 SEALED MOTION for Rule 23 Class Certification filed by Rick Harlow. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil for all further proceedings. District Judge John W. Lungstrum no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/10/2008.(ses)
April 8, 2009
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court finds the notice meets the standards set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B). The Court directs counsel for plaintiffs to mail copies of the Notice set forth in Appendix A to each employee identified as a potential member of the class. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/8/09. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A)(yh) Modified on 4/9/2009 (ck).
February 28, 2012
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 171 Defendants' Motion to Compel Responses to Their Second Set of Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Production. The Court finds that Second Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 4 have been adequately answered and that the class member completed surveys sought in Second Request No. 4 are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 2/28/2012. (byk)
November 26, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 310 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Sprint is ordered to (1) produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' Sixth Request Nos. 52-53 within 30 days of this Memorandum and Order (or the time frame agreed by the parties); (2) forthwith start the process of working cooperatively with Plaintiffs in good faith to reduce the data set size in the NDW and NOR data warehouses; and (3) produce the NDW and NOR data relevant to commissions for Sprint's Business Direct Channel within 90 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order (or the time frame agreed by the parties). Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 11/26/2013. (byk)
May 9, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: 372 MOTION for Settlement Preliminary Approval by Plaintiffs. Show Cause Response due by 5/21/2018. The response shall include (1) a revised motion for preliminary approval, (2) a revised settlement agreement or the parties' arguments against revising the agreement and (3) a motion for the Courtto approve the adequacy of the settlement agreement's proposed notice plan. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 5/9/2018. (ydm)